News
linkedininstagramfacebook twitter youtube

Incoloy 800HT vs Inconel 600: High-Temp Alloy Cost & Performance Comparison

14:14:35 06/18/2026

Incoloy 800HT (UNS N08811 / W.Nr. 1.4959) and Inconel 600 (UNS N06600 / W.Nr. 2.4816) are both workhorse high-temperature nickel-base alloys, yet they serve different design intents. Incoloy 800HT is a Fe–Ni–Cr alloy (~45% Fe) optimized for creep strength + carburization resistance at 760–982°C​ in furnace/reformer service, while Inconel 600 is a high-nickel (≥72% Ni) Cr–Fe alloy prized for chloride stress-corrosion cracking (SCC) resistance, cryogenic toughness, and oxidation to ~1095°C​ in non-carburizing air. Below is a rigorous, side-by-side comparison to help engineers and purchasers choose correctly and avoid over-specifying (cost) or under-specifying (risk).


1. Chemical Composition & Metallurgical Difference

Element

Incoloy 800HT (N08811)

Inconel 600 (N06600)

Ni

30.0 – 35.0%

≥ 72.0%​ (72–78%)

Cr

19.0 – 23.0%

14.0 – 17.0%

Fe

≥ 39.5% (Balance)

6.0 – 10.0%

C

0.06 – 0.10%

≤ 0.15% (typ. 0.03–0.08%)

Al + Ti

0.85 – 1.20%​ (γ′ former)

— (not intentionally added)

Heat Treatment

Solution annealed ≥ 1149°C, grain size ≥ ASTM 5

Solution annealed 870–1090°C (typ. 980°C), often finer grain

Key takeaway: 800HT's Fe content reduces cost but limits maximum use in veryhigh sulfur or extremelypure oxidizing atmospheres above ~980°C; Inconel 600's high Ni gives it superior resistance to chloride SCC and better toughness down to cryogenic temps but makes it more expensive and less creep-strong above 700°C than 800HT in pressurized service.


2. High-Temperature Mechanical & Creep Performance

Property / Behavior

Incoloy 800HT (N08811)

Inconel 600 (N06600)

Room Temp. Rm / Rp0.2

≥ 450 MPa / ≥ 170 MPa

≥ 550 MPa / ≥ 240 MPa

100,000 h Creep-Rupture (704°C)

~115–130 MPa

Lower in this temp band (not optimized for creep)

ASME Design Temp. (Pressure)

To 982°C (1800°F)​ per Sect. I; creep-governed 760–982°C

Typically to 649–871°C​ depending on code case; nota creep-strength alloy >700°C

Best Creep Service Range

760–982°C​ (reformer/cracker tubes)

< 650–700°C for stress; >700°C used for oxidation-only (non-pressurized)

Grain Boundary Control

Coarse grain + γ′(Ni₃(Al,Ti)) → creep resistant

Usually finer grain → better formability, fatigue in some cases

➡️ Rule of thumb:​ For pressurizedhigh-temp process (reformer tubes, ethylene cracker radiant tubes) → 800HT. For non-pressurizedhigh-temp oxidation shielding, furnace muffles, or where SCC/cryogenic matters → often Inconel 600​ (or 601 if oxidation >1095°C).


3. Corrosion / Environmental Resistance Comparison

Environment

Incoloy 800HT

Inconel 600

Comment

High-Temp Oxidation (air/combustion gas, ≤870°C cont.)

★★★★☆ Good (Cr₂O₃)

★★★★☆ Good (Cr₂O₃); slightly better at very high T (>980°C) due to higher Ni

Both acceptable

Oxidation >980°C (intermittent)

Usable to ~1100°C short term

Better — Inconel 601 preferred if >1050°C continuous

Carburization / Metal Dusting (CO/CH₄, furnace atm.)

★★★★☆ Very good (coarse grain + Al/Ti)

★★ Moderate — less resistant than 800HT

800HT preferred for cracker tubes

Cl⁻ SCC (aqueous, ≤200°C)

★★★★★ (30% Ni suffices)

★★★★★ (≥72% Ni, best-in-class)

Both excellent vs. 300-series SS

Caustic (NaOH/KOH)

Good to ~300°C

Excellent (high Ni)

600 often chosen for caustic evaporators

Reducing Acids (H₂SO₄, HCl)

✗ Poor

✗ Poor (use C-276 / 825)

Neither is acid-alloy

Sulfidation (low O₂, high S, >650°C)

Limited — check pS₂

Slightly better due to higher Ni but still limited

May need Inconel 601/671 or higher Cr


4. Fabricability, Welding & Typical Applications

  • Weldability:​ Both are weldable with GTAW/GMAW.

    • 800HT → filler ERNiCr-3 (NiCr-3, AWS A5.14)​ recommended; post-weld solution anneal restores optimal creep properties in high-temp service.

    • Inconel 600 → filler ERNiCr-3​ or ENiCrFe-2/-3; often used as-is (as-welded) for aqueous SCC service; annealed for high-temp.

  • Formability:​ Inconel 600 (finer grain, higher ductility) springs back more but forms well; 800HT is stiffer at room temp due to coarse grain.

  • Typical 800HT Apps:​ Ethylene cracker radiant tubes, SMR catalyst tubes, secondary reformer transitions, carburizing furnace mufflers (760–950°C, creep + carburization).

  • Typical Inconel 600 Apps:​ Furnace muffles & retorts (non-pressurized, oxidation only), thermocouple sheaths, nuclear steam generator tubing (SCC resistance), caustic evaporator tubing, aerospace ducting, cryogenic tanks.


5. Cost & Sourcing Consideration (Practical Note for Buyers)

  • Material Cost (relative index):​ Incoloy 800HT ≈ 60–75% of Inconel 600​ base price (Fe replaces ~40% of Ni). Actual spread varies with LME Ni fluctuation.

  • When to save with 800HT:​ High-temp creep-pressureservice where Inconel 600 lacks sufficient creep-rupture strength → 800HT is both cheaper and​ technically superior.

  • When to pay for Inconel 600:​ Need chloride SCC + cryogenic toughness, or aqueous caustic service, or non-pressurized high-temp air-oxidation <980°C where creep is not design driver and you want easier forming/higher Ni for certain passivation needs.

  • Don't substitute blindly:​ Never replace 800HT with 600 in reformer/cracker tube service (>760°C pressurized carburizing) — creep life will be inadequate. Conversely, don't replace 600 SCC-critical nuclear secondary side or caustic service with 800HT unless verified — usually acceptable but 600 is the benchmark.

 

Home Tel Mail Inquiry

whatsapp chat